01 / REVIEW

Set the scope

List the conditions to be represented: surface pattern, edge, transition and any selected system interface. Identify which parts of the project the mockup does not represent.

02 / REVIEW

Record conditions

Document products, dimensions, assembly revision and observation conditions. Separate appearance comments from technical review. A pleasing finish does not establish structural or accessibility approval.

03 / REVIEW

Preserve the outcome

Record requested changes, accepted attributes and unresolved questions. If the supplied material or assembly later changes, decide which conclusions need to be revisited.

Include the difficult junction in the mockup

A few straight boards show surface character but may omit the detail that causes trouble later. Select a representative junction: a border, access cover, post interface or transition to paving. Include the actual proposed materials and identify any parts that remain conceptual.

Write the review questions before assembling the sample. Appearance, installation access, documented geometry and future removal are different questions. A visually accepted sample should not silently become a structural or accessibility approval.

Record what the mockup does and does not establish

Scroll sideways to read all columns. Keyboard: focus the table and use the arrow keys.

Record what the mockup does and does not establish
Review topicUseful observation
AppearanceVariation, orientation and joint rhythm
Installation sequenceWhether the proposed work can be assembled as detailed
AccessHow fixings and removable parts can be reached
MaintenanceHow cleaning and replacement reach the interface
Unresolved designItems requiring separate professional or source-backed review

For a fictional access cover, the boards look continuous when closed, but the lifting arrangement is obstructed by a nearby bench. That is a useful mockup finding. The response is to coordinate the interface before repeating it along the route.

Photograph the accepted state, record changes and keep the sample reference with the issued detail. If construction differs from the mockup, identify the difference explicitly instead of citing the earlier approval without qualification.

Run the review as a set of separate decisions

Before the review, identify who needs to see the sample and which decision each person can make. The owner may select the appearance reference while the installer demonstrates access and the responsible designer reviews an interface. Keep those roles visible rather than recording one unexplained “mockup approved” result.

Scroll sideways to read all columns. Keyboard: focus the table and use the arrow keys.

Run the review as a set of separate decisions
Fictional questionObservationRecorded outcome
Is the variation acceptable?Owner reviews the identified sample facesAppearance reference accepted for that sample
Can the selected board be removed?Adjacent bench prevents the proposed accessInterface revision requested
Does the wet-condition evidence apply?Only a dry specimen report is suppliedEvidence remains unresolved
Is the alternate edge represented?The alternate edge is absentExcluded from this review

These outcomes can all be true at once. Accepting the appearance does not erase the access problem. Leaving the wet-condition question unresolved does not make the observed assembly useless; it defines the next piece of evidence the team needs.

Repeat only the parts affected by a change

When a change is proposed, identify which prior conclusions it affects. Changing a finish can affect the appearance and the surface-evidence review. Moving a bench can affect replacement access. Changing the board profile can affect fit and attachment. Record the reason for the renewed review instead of simply copying every earlier acceptance into a new revision.

Keep photographs, sample identifiers, drawing revisions and the decision record together. If a mockup is retained for comparison, identify what state it represents and how changes will be documented. If it will be dismantled, retain the information needed to understand the reviewed assembly after it is gone.

At production handover, show the crew the accepted references and the unresolved or excluded conditions. A mockup is valuable because it makes a decision concrete. Its usefulness ends when the sample loses its identity or is cited for details that it never contained.

A public-route planning scenario

Concept example: a mockup includes one paving transition and a typical board joint. Its acceptance record explicitly excludes a different overlook edge that was not built into the sample.

Use the result

Keep the completed review with the relevant project record. Assign unresolved items before relying on a conclusion. If the material, condition or document changes, revisit the affected questions.

Boardwalk planner
Technical references

General background for the subject. Project worksheets and fictional situations are original review aids, not official agency forms.

Access Board: floor and ground surfaces

Access Board: federal outdoor developed areas

Federal procurement reference: FAR 11.104